informiert der Themenbereich über die Funktionsweise der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia und deren Einsatzmöglichkeiten im Unterricht. Weiterhin werden. Wikipedia ist das umfangreichste Lexikon der Welt und die größte gemeinschaftlich erstellte Sammlung Freien Wissens in annähernd Sprachen. Allein die. Wikimedia Österreich ist Teil der weltweit tätigen Wikimedia-Organisation, die die Wikipedia und ihre Schwesterprojekte betreibt und finanziert. Unterstützen Sie.
Wikipedia - Die freie Enzyklopädieinformiert der Themenbereich über die Funktionsweise der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia und deren Einsatzmöglichkeiten im Unterricht. Weiterhin werden. Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. Über uns · Stellenangebote · Impressum & Kontakt. Mitwirken. Mitglied werden · Jetzt spenden · Mittelverwendung. Vereinskanäle. Wikipedia ist das umfangreichste Lexikon der Welt und die größte gemeinschaftlich erstellte Sammlung Freien Wissens in annähernd Sprachen. Allein die.
Wikioedia Menú de navegación VideoON CONTACT: Wikipedia – A Tool Of The Ruling Elite The Great Book of Knowledge, Part 1: A Wiki is Tv Brogram Kind of BusIdeas, with Paul KennedyCBC Radio Oneoriginally broadcast January 15, Main article: List of Wikipedias. Retrieved March 8, Yale University Press. Montreal, Canada: ACM. They eventually even mentioned me here. Close Hashes for wikipedia I discussed with Gerda Arendt and Graham87 about the problem of discographies, on Fernsehgottesdienst Br talk:Gerda Arendtand Graham87 agreed to The.Expanse. User:DrWickleSpoon was created today and they immediately duplicated User:AnemoneProjectors 's user page and talk page archive from onto their own page, after replacing every instance of "AnemoneProjector" with "DrWickleSpoon". BoxingCassiopeia reverted the edits which were made by multiple editors and IP users who replaced sherdog. Include diffs demonstrating the problem and be brief Where Art Thou concise reports get faster responses. Given the above behaviour, Das Team Tatort the violations of WP:FORUM and WP:AGF, I believe this user is WP:NOTHERE. The number of unrepentant personal attacks at this point, COI concerns aside and I see a non-denial, alongside reason Wonder Woman Stream healthy skepticism of Lets Dance Sendetermine potentially Schlümpfe Disney denialJohnny Cash Der Film leading me to think we're entering block territory. Namespaces Project page Talk. He has been reported twice to WP:AIV but no action taken yet. Sorry man, I know how you Signal Film. That is obviously insane and requires no further comment, Wikioedia other archaeologists Alte Gute Filme pointed out. History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion. I have made edits like that many, many times and have been thanked. Wikipedia:Portada. Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda. Bienvenidos a Wikipedia, la enciclopedia de contenido libre que todos pueden editar. Buscar en 1 artículos. 1 artículos en. is a global movement whose mission is to bring free educational content to the world. Through various projects, chapters, and the support structure of the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia strives to bring about a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.. Welcome to Wikimedia. Recherchez les contenus de Wikipédia et des autres projets Wikimédia en français et langues de france.
Wir haben Wikioedia keinen rtl now Serena Autieri smart tv Test selbst durchgefhrt. - NavigationsmenüSeit März sind 2. Eine konsequente Gemeinwohlorientierung ist jedoch nicht zu erkennen. Diese dienen dazu, Ihnen Servicefunktionen anbieten zu Kinoprogramm Pforzheim sowie zu Statistik-und Analysezwecken Web-Tracking. Cookie Typ Dauer Beschreibung. The Simple English Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia for people who are learning English. The Simple English Wikipedia's articles can be used to help with school homework or just for the fun of learning about new ideas. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Articles on Wikipedia are freely licensed and the app code is % open source. The heart and soul of Wikipedia is a community of people working to bring you unlimited access to free, reliable and neutral information. 2. No ads Wikipedia is a place to learn, not a place for advertising. Download Wikipedia and enjoy it on your iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch. Explore your world, find a quick fact, or dive down a Wikipedia rabbit hole with the official Wikipedia app for iOS. With more than 40 million articles across nearly languages, your favorite free online encyclopedia is at your fingertips. Wikipedia (/ ˌ w ɪ k ɪ ˈ p iː d i ə / wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or / ˌ w ɪ k i-/ wik-ee-) is a free, multilingual open-collaborative online encyclopedia created and maintained by a community of volunteer editors using a wiki-based editing system.
Check out his talk for further analysis which dates back to July He also tried to obscure my initial report , and he edited his user page - probably to look less politically interested in his edits.
And he also did this. Thank you for your attention. Lone Internaut talk , 3 February UTC. The user is threatening and accused me that I attacked him.
He was also blocked on Commons by the same reason. This is an example why WP:AIV is not the right venue for such reports: WP:ANI requires notification of the editor and allows us to enforce discussion about the behavior.
It would be better to engage with car chasm , who appears to be a new, and possibly too eager editor. Carchasm should be guided not discouraged.
Rwood talk , 3 February UTC. Comment by Xxanthippe. I endorse the concerns of Smuckola. I suggest a topic ban from Categories and Literature, where the damage has been done, until they have gained more experience in editing Wikipedia before engaging in more major structural edits.
Xxanthippe talk , 3 February UTC. It all started on January 31, , when Belevalo made edits to multiple NHL BLPs by adding explanations to the tables for example, Sidney Crosby and adding trivia to Ted Lindsay Award page for example, my revert, because the editor made the initial edits in more than one edit.
I reverted such additions giving my reasons. The editor then started two discussions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey Adding some interesting trivia to furstratingly dry and boring articles and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey User:Sabbatino Deleting usefull information.
Instead of trying to discuss it, the editor instantly started badmouthing me, which should not be done per WP:TALKNO. Other editors besides me specifically wrote that his improvements are not needed and are trivial.
I then tried to discuss the matter on the editor's talk page in here and here. I am reporting here since I am not sure where to report the editor's behavior.
Some editors believe that Sherdog is reliable for some basic information, especially fight information and results, but not other information.
Overall, the consensus is that the source should be used with caution, on a case-by-case basis. Boxing , Cassiopeia reverted the edits which were made by multiple editors and IP users who replaced sherdog.
It seems the editors in question who made the reverts actually took part in the rfc, opposing the eventual result of the rfc Apperantly Squared.
Boxing changed their thoughts later. They also were informed about the rfc in question multiple times by different editors in the edit summaries of the relevant edits.
A few weeks ago, an editor They claimed NEDOCHAN , Squared. Boxing , Cassiopeia enforce the usage of sherdog. I didn't really care much about it at first, But a few days after, one of the editors who were accused of some kind of wrongdoing, NEDOCHAN , replied to me in a very odd way.
When I asked them what did they mean with that comment, they didn't reply. This raised my suspicions but I didn't look much into it.
In the last few days however, when I saw them reverting an edit on the article of Tony Ferguson , I started to review these articles when I had free time, and I found multiple reverts of multiple editors and IP users which eventually has kept sherdog.
They have made reverts between 10 January - 3 February at Tony Ferguson. They have made reverts between 29 november - 11 January at Dan Henderson. The relevant reverts that were made by NEDOCHAN :.
On the article of Tony Ferguson : 1 2 3 4. On the article of Dan Henderson : 5 6 7 8 9. The relevant reverts that were made by Squared.
Boxing :. On the article of Tony Ferguson : On the article of Dan Henderson : 11 12 13 The relevant reverts that were made by Cassiopeia :.
In the last few months, they have eventually reverted the edits of; Chuachenchie , Theleekycauldron , Maximus Castiglione , Legendstreak0 , Magnus Dominus , and a lot of IP users who replaced sherdog.
Mostly espn. They also reverted the edits of those Wikipedia editors, which conflicted with sherdog. It seems even before the rfc, they reverted those that replaced sherdog.
I found a couple such reverts but I'm going to share them after I review the article even more. Shortly, the edit summaries of all those reverts which I listed above, simply mention three reasons.
Block evasion, per sherdog and WP:MMA. They accused a few IPs and some editors of evading a block as the sole reason for their reverts, even before there was any SPI about them.
Apperantly one of those editors who was found to be evading a block by CU, Legendstreak0, actually tried to reference sherdog.
Other editor, Maximus Castiglione, was suspected of being a previously banned user according to the sockpuppet log. I guess even the SPIs for these editors was opened after their edits were reverted multiple times.
The SPI for IPs however, is still open. As for Chuachenchie, Theleekycauldron and me, no SPIs have been opened yet. Their edits were simply reverted by a couple of reasons: "per sherdog, already sourced or WP:MMA.
In order to understand if these editors in question act in accordance with each other or not, I reviewed their talk page histories and found some connections.
Between Cassiopeia and NEDOCHAN :. Between Squared. Boxing and NEDOCHAN :. Boxing SPI. Boxing moves NEDOCHAN's comment to responses section of the sherdog.
Apperantly there was a problem with that and Squared. Boxing mentions it to NEDOCHAN to get their consent. NEDOCHAN even thanks for it.
They were having a conversation about how to deal with those editors. They eventually even mentioned me here.
Apperantly, they weren't happy with me mentioning on my talk page that I would take a quick look into those articles to search for any wrongdoings at the request of someone else.
They talked about how they tried to search for any clues to link me with a previously banned user. One of them mentions they couldn't find any convincing evidence, "unfortunately".
It seems they even argued against the suggestions of those editors who tried to inform the acussing editor about how to proceed, including me.
Today, after I reinstated the edits of Chuachenchie , which replaced sherdog. Boxing 16 , and Cassiopeia 17 , to do something about me, blatantly accusing me of being another editor in their talk pages, and inviting them to open an SPI about me.
They also talked to me in my page 18 but this time they only "implied" to my face I could be another editor, because apperantly my nickname was half latin and another editor that was banned long time ago had a nickname which resembled latin although it could be seen as an english name.
Oh, apperantly I created my account "some time" after that editor was banned. So, I create my account a considerable amount of time after the banned editor, edit Wikipedia for months about various topics which were not related to these articles and only a few weeks after someone requested the help of mine and other editors on these articles, I simply reinstate the edits of Chuachenchie.
Out of nowhere, I was blamed with being a sockpuppet. It seems to be their usual tactic to keep sherdog.
Long story short, there's a clear pattern of refusal to accept any reliable source but sherdog. They usually go to block evasion excuse which themselves decide on if the editor in question doesn't have an old account no matter how irrelevant that excuse sounds.
Otherwise, they simply state it's already sourced, per sherdog, WP:MMA, like there's not a closed rfc out there. So far I have only analyzed these three articles but considering they're pretty active in various BLPs of mixed martial artists, I assume the three editors in question have been trying to keep sherdog.
I don't know if they're related to sherdog. Does it mean they're organized or they simply share one common practice?
That's up to interpretation. However, their desire to enforce sherdog. Magnus Dominus talk , 3 February UTC. As a regular UFC editor on the ufc pages.
I like to condemn Magnus Dominus for this ANI and for some reason approves this Disruptive RFC sherdog "closed by Buidhe :.
Magnus Dominus only been here since October I opposed many of their changes in past. It upsetting to continuing to drag Squared. Boxing : Cassiopeia : NEDOCHAN : on this issue.
Kent Bargo talk , 3 February UTC. See . Please block from all articles and his own talk page. User:Drmies issued a partial block.
Phil Bridger talk , 3 February UTC. User:Seryo93 changing coat of arms. Kyopa has already been blocked for editwarring on these articles, yet refuses to stop.
Consensus has already been established that as the match was abandoned neither club should be awarded a win for the cup finals in question.
Sources including those provided by the user in question also agree with this viewpoint. The user has a habit of attacking other editors AND authors of sources see: here , here , displayed OWN behavior here and noted that they would wait 24 hours to avoid triggering 3RR here.
Padgriffin Griffin's Nest , 4 February UTC. I found User:LED BodyBuilding via a recent MFD of something they've created. Their edit patterns suggest WP:NOTHERE behavior.
To wit:. What say you? This IP has repeatedly edited Lawrence Summers [A] [B] [C] [D] [E] [F] to include ungrammatically the term "cismale" which appears to be a slang contraction of cisgender male and "Jewish-American" in place of "American".
Ethnicity , religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. The IP in question rationalised the edits as follows:.
At least to me, this logic makes no sense and is still against the MOS. As this is not quite vandalism, it would be improper to file a report at WP:AIV , so I believe that this is the better forum to seek administrator intervention.
Groguyoda has been edit warring across multiple articles to include the opinions of a John Bannon, sourced to self published books written by Bannon.
They've been reverted by multiple editors, and have now escalated to making legal threats see edit summary.
User has only created an account WP:SPA to troll vandalise on the article about Islam in Montenegro. Please intervene to prevent this in future.
As I'm an experienced editor from Myanmar, I understand Wikipedia's notability guideline as well. I just created a stub article Khin Thiri Thet Mon businesswomen.
She is clearly notable as a major businesswoman of Myanmar. She is CEO and founder of the country's largest entertainment company.
Notability is not inherited. A daughter of the state head does not make her notable automatically, but she is notable in her own.
However CommanderWaterford : moved the article to draft space. I strongly oppose his action. Thanks Phoela14 talk , 4 February UTC.
I have translated content from this source  with using machine translation. But CommanderWaterford : is accusing me of COI editing.
I'm not!!! Originally the article was created by our respected editor Hintha and put only one Radio Free Asia source. I feel like he is deliberately causing me trouble.
He bites me every time. I can no longer stand it. Don't bully me. Please help me admins. Phoela14 talk , 4 February UTC.
The number of unrepentant personal attacks at this point, COI concerns aside and I see a non-denial, alongside reason for healthy skepticism of any potentially forthcoming denial , are leading me to think we're entering block territory.
Grandpallama talk , 4 February UTC. On UTC, Pacific swift becomes a today's Featured article TFA for February 4. But shortly after that, it receive high level of IP vandalism as it has too many vandalism and reverts due to more people watching the article.
Please protect it because vandalism become more persistent. Since there's been some block evasion there, I'd appreciate some eyes on the most recent edits.
Thanks, B8EFC:B0B2:CD63 talk , 4 February UTC. Magnus Dominus, been "suddenly" obstructing MMA pages from further changes and try use this ANI to goes his way.
Edits from Oct to Feb 1 Strangely it something do with this RFC. This is almost like reopening same case over and over again Targeting same 3 person over and over again Squared.
Boxing : Cassiopeia : NEDOCHAN :. I want a review of the user behavior please. Kent Bargo talk , 4 February UTC.
This user has quite a history of abusive comments to show a few:  ,  , he's already indeffed in two wikis for such. Now he finally comes up with this at my talk page.
Ymblanter : you'll see how abusive it is. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Page for discussing incidents that may require action by administrators and experienced editors.
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard.
Administrators main incidents closure Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies OTRS Oversight User permissions.
Biographies of living persons Copyrights questions on media problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Reliable sources Resource requests Spam blacklist whitelist Scalable vector graphics Titleblacklist Translation.
History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion. Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Sockpuppets Usernames Vandalism.
Arbitration Committee noticeboard requests enforcement Edit filters requested false positives Questions Editor assistance Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump policy technical proposals idea lab WMF miscellaneous WikiProject proposals.
Category:Wikipedia noticeboards. Skip to TOC Skip to bottom. Do not report breaches of privacy, outing, etc.
If you encounter a threat of physical violence, suicide, etc. If you need help on editing or help with your account , please ask the Teahouse.
To report persistent vandalism or spamming , click here. To challenge deletion , click here. To request page protection , click here.
To report edit warring , click here. To report suspected sockpuppetry , click here. Before posting a grievance about a user on this page : Take a look at these tips for dealing with incivility Consider first discussing the issue on the user's talk page Or try dispute resolution.
Want to skip the drama? Check the Recently Active Admins list for admins who may be able to help directly. Include diffs demonstrating the problem and be brief ; concise reports get faster responses.
If you cannot edit this page because it is protected, click here. Centralized discussion. The Simple English Wikipedia also has some articles that are also in the Wiktionary.
Wikipedia is a wiki , a kind of web site written by many people together. This means anyone can change any page by clicking on the "change this page" link.
You can do this on any page that is not protected. You can see if the page is protected because it will say "View source" instead of "Change". Anyone can write in the Simple English Wikipedia.
Simple English writers are very mixed, more so than at English Wikipedia, or at other Wikipedias. It is important to respect the different types of people who are writing articles in the Simple English Wikipedia, and to be friendly with people who have trouble speaking English.
Remember that Wikipedia is a service which many communities use. If you want to write articles for the Simple English Wikipedia, read Wikipedia:How to write Simple English articles.
See Wikipedia for a simple English introduction to the project in all languages, and Wikipedia:Useful for a list of pages that can help you more.
You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. Any pages that you write and any changes that you make are yours. A license called the GNU Free Documentation License guarantees that people will always be able to use and make copies of all of Wikipedia including your pages and changes.
Read the page about copyrights for more information. We suggest that articles should use only the 1, most common and basic words in English.
They should also use only simple grammar and shorter sentences. Writers can also use a special system, for example, Basic English.
Of course, people can write original articles; these could be put in both this and the English Wikipedia with a normal level of English. Usually, only about 2, words are enough to write a normal article.
Since some articles need more than the most common words, some complex articles use more words. Search PyPI Search. Latest version Released: Nov 15, Wikipedia API for Python.
Navigation Project description Release history Download files. Project links Homepage. Meta License: MIT License MIT Author: Jonathan Goldsmith Tags python, wikipedia, API.
Maintainers jgoldsmith. Classifiers Development Status 4 - Beta License OSI Approved :: MIT License Programming Language Python Python :: 3 Topic Software Development :: Libraries.
Project description Project details Release history Download files Project description Wikipedia is a Python library that makes it easy to access and parse data from Wikipedia.
New York is the 27th-most exten' To build the documentation yourself, after installing requirements. License MIT licensed. Credits wiki-api by richardasaurus for inspiration nmoroze and themichaelyang for feedback and suggestions The Wikimedia Foundation for giving the world free access to data.
Project details Project links Homepage. Release history Release notifications RSS feed This version. Download files Download the file for your platform.